Pinwheels

Death of a Salesman v. The Good Earth

August 21, 2007 · 6 Comments

The September 2007 Vanity Fair features an article by Suzanna Andrews about playwrite Arthur Miller and his son Daniel, who was born with Down syndrome. Shortly after birth, Miller placed Daniel in an institution, and never made contact again. The article suggests several reasons for Miller’s actions, including the fear that raising Daniel would distract him from his work.

Amy from Life According to Emma and Joe posted about this story, as did Barbara Curtis at Mommy Life.

As a counterpoint, I offer Pearl S. Buck: Pulitzer Prize for the novel (1932), Nobel Prize for Literature (1938), author of more than 70 published works, and mother to six children including Carol, a multiply-disabled daughter with the then-undiagnosed condition PKU.

And a quote from Pearl S. Buck, here:

In a mood of faith and hope my work goes on. A ream of fresh paper lies on my desk waiting for the next book. I am a writer and I take up my pen to write.

Categories: Down syndrome · Writing

6 responses so far ↓

  • kyra // August 21, 2007 at 1:22 am | Reply

    i’ve pre-ordered your book! so exciting!

  • kristen // August 21, 2007 at 2:46 am | Reply

    Oh, I was reading that article today and wondering if you had seen it. I’m off to read the links you mention here. That article made me so sad…

  • karen // August 21, 2007 at 4:59 am | Reply

    Everyone has their own tolerance for what they perceive as pain, or joy, or simply Life. I cannot, any longer, be judgmental of the actions of others unless I hold myself up to a similar painful and honest viewing (and even that gives me no real right for judgment, for who can truly know what’s in another’s heart and soul?). Nor do I, on the other hand, necessarily condone actions I think I will never make.

    Some things I simply must offer up as those that are part of the mysteries of life and being human.

  • jennifergg // August 21, 2007 at 2:17 pm | Reply

    Kyra, thank you!

    Kristen, I agree. It makes me very very sad, too. The article mentions that Miller never produced a culturally significant work after Daniel’s birth, and I think it was left to speculation, What if? What if he had taken Daniel into his life, and that his creativity was actually rekindled?

    And Karen: of course, you are right. It’s not my intention to judge, and in putting forth Pearl S. Buck, I’m lifting her onto the same pedestal Miller was on, and no one should be up there, really. We’re all human, and fallible.

  • Katrina Stonoff // August 21, 2007 at 5:37 pm | Reply

    Oh, I love the Pearl Buck story and quote! Very sad for Arthur Miller though. Think what he missed.

  • Killlashandra // August 21, 2007 at 6:29 pm | Reply

    I didn’t know that. I don’t normally read Vanity Fair either. I’ve enjoyed Miller’s works and the situation does leave the door open for speculation I have to agree.

Leave a Comment